U.S. Supreme Court Sidesteps Condo Assessment Dispute

The United States Supreme Court, during its recently-ended 2018 Term, declined  to review the decision of a federal appeals court that a condominium owner is not personally responsible for payment of assessments which become due after the owner files a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition when the owner makes all payments under a bankruptcy payment plan approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

The Bankruptcy Court in Washington State ruled that the obligation to pay assessments arises when each monthly assessment is due, allowing a condominium to collect the assessments for the 4-year period between the time when the bankruptcy was filed and the lender foreclosed on the condominium unit.

Appeals Court Voids Payment Obligation

However, the federal appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Goudelock v. Sixty-01 Association of Apartment Owners, decided differently that the obligation to pay all future assessments was established when the owner purchased the condominium unit which was subject to the assessment covenant in the condominium declaration creating the condominium.  The appeals court concluded that  assessments which became due after the Chapter 13 bankruptcy was filed should be regarded as “unmatured contingent debts” which arose prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.  Therefore, the owner had no obligation to pay such assessments even though the assessments were not due until after the bankruptcy petition was filed.

The appellate court noted that the federal Bankruptcy Code requires a condo unit owner to pay post-bankruptcy assessments in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, but that obligation does not apply in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy when all bankruptcy plan payments are made.  The court also noted that the assessment lien is not affected by the Chapter 13 bankruptcy and the lien may be enforced by a foreclosure sale.  The court rejected the condominium association’s contention that it is inequitable and unfair for an owner to own a condominium unit without paying assessments and suggested that it up to Congress to change the bankruptcy laws.

In its July 2018 decision, the appeals court noted that it is the first federal appeals court to address whether a condominium association can collect  assessments which become due after filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  Because other bankruptcy courts and federal trial courts have ruled that a condominium owner is always obligated to pay post-petition assessments, the request that the United States Supreme Court review the appeals court ruling was supported in an amicus brief by the Community Associations Institute.

Maryland Bankruptcy Court Guidance

Although the decision of the Ninth Circuit federal court applies only in certain Western states (and Alaska and Hawaii), the Maryland Bankruptcy Court similarly ruled in January 2018 that assessments which become due after a Chapter 13 bankruptcy is filed are uncollectible if the owner makes all bankruptcy plan payments.  However, the Maryland court guidance allows for relief from the bankruptcy stay so a condominium or homeowners association can obtain a state court judgment for the assessments which become due after the filing of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, but the court judgment cannot be enforced by seizing bank accounts or wages until it is known whether all bankruptcy plan payments are made and the debt becomes uncollectible.

Posted by Thomas Schild Law Group, LLC, attorneys for condominiums, homeowner associations and housing cooperatives in Maryland -– including Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Howard County, and Baltimore County; and in Baltimore City and Washington, D.C.


This entry was posted in Assessment Collection, Condominiums, Homeowner Associations and tagged , , by Tom Schild. Bookmark the permalink.

About Tom Schild

MarylandCondominiumlaw.net is written by Thomas C. Schild. Tom focuses his practice in the representation of community associations. Since 1985, he has represented condominiums, homeowners associations, and housing cooperatives throughout Maryland and Washington D.C. He is recognized locally and nationwide as a leader in the field of community association law. Tom has written numerous articles and presented many seminars concerning various aspects of condominium and homeowners associations operations. He has recently presented programs regarding community associations insurance, contracts, leasing restrictions, tips for avoiding litigation, and community governance. He is a long-time member and past Chair of the Maryland Legislative Action Committee of the Community Associations Institute (CAI), which represents community association interests before the Maryland General Assembly. Tom is also a member of CAI's National Faculty and teaches a Community Governance course for community association managers in cities nationwide. And, he is a member of the College of Community Association Lawyers (CCAL) which is comprised of fewer than 150 lawyers nationwide recognized for their leadership and contributions in the field of community law. He previously served on the Board of Directors of CAI's Washington Metropolitan Chapter. Tom is a 1976 graduate of Northwestern University and a 1980 graduate of the George Washington University Law School. He is admitted to practice before the state and federal courts in Maryland and the District of Columbia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.